At some point, did someone tell you terrible news? How about encouraging news? What is the difference or is there a difference?
Uplifting news is content or data that satisfies us, is meaningful, comforting, protected, and approved.
Terrible news is the opposite.
So there seems to be a difference between great news and terrible news - read on.
Have you ever received terrible news, but in the end everything went well or even better than you expected? Have you received encouraging news at some point, and what you thought was encouraging turned out to be not so great for a long time?
From personal experience, I can understand that I have encountered each of the four -
Reassuring news, it was great.
Terrible news that was terrible.
Uplifting news that I thought was great turned out to be terrible.
Terrible news that I thought was terrible, but turned out to be great.
Confused at this moment? Well, I realize that after a while I was often confused by the contrast between these two apparent back messages. However, at this point, I discovered that sometimes terrible news for one person can be seen as uplifting news for another person, and that uplifting news for one person can be seen as terrible news after a while.
Confused? Let me clarify.
After all, it's just news, and what makes it terrible, great, or even impartial is not just information, but how we see it, judge it, evaluate it, or react to it.
How can anyone find terrible news as wonderful as you ask? Or vice versa, how is it that someone can consider uplifting news to be terrible?
In short, each of us has an exceptional history, encounters, beliefs and values, and, accordingly, none of us at any moment sees the same thing or the same situation in the same way.
Someone who is more restless, pessimistic, skeptical, or irritable may find the delay terrible when someone else understands the idea that there are things we can handle and there are things we can't handle, so why angry about something? you can't handle it or, again, assuming you can handle it, go ahead. For more details visit hbar news.
In the end, everything that happens just happens, and we decipher everything according to our assumptions, goals, needs, or views that are interesting to each of us.
Let me introduce you to a few individual models. Also assuming you take the clarification into account even though you may not have had the same conditions, logically I can understand this.
Before I started talking and getting ready for work, I was a community project manager for an international association. A tiresome report, but in short: I didn't like my boss, the president, and that's why he fired me. Terrible news, right? Well, that was all I expected in conclusion, it was time to start a profession that has lasted north of 40 years and has allowed me to see the world (today 25 countries) and work for certain giant clients and crowds. So, in the end, this terrible news was really uplifting.
Here's another quick one.
A few years before that, I proposed to my soulmate, and she agreed. Reassuring news, right? (Here, please, no solutions). After a long time, following a valiant effort of more than fifteen years, I have come to the conclusion that the time has come to put an end to this, and why? Indeed, without the disgusting subtleties, the relationship was slowly eroding my confidence, confidence, and hope, and I came to the conclusion that I was trying to avoid who I was becoming in that relationship. We parted, brilliantly, but we parted. The encouraging news is that after some time I was able to return everything that I had lost, sincerely and deeply.
We have our accounts as a whole, and as a whole we can agree on the good news and the terrible news that we have received, but in the end, it's usually news.
During part of my corporate projects, I share this basic idea - stop asking your representatives about good or bad news - just ask them about the news, and then you will conclude what kind of news it is. Because their definition may not be exactly the same as yours.
